|
|
Common Errors in New Housing
Design and Construction
By Bruce Barbour - May 2020
As I live in a new housing estate on the outskirts of Melbourne
Australia I get to see some of the errors that are quite common in
new housing design and construction as I walk around the estate.
Use of Natural Gas - A large percentage of new housing is
still being connected to reticulated natural gas. In Victoria there
is even a rule that if you don't have natural gas connected, where
available, you have to have a minimum 2 kL rain water tank. While
having a water tank has benefits (though not financial!) it is
problematic if there is insufficient space to install a tank - and
anyway it is a nonsensical requirement - the use of gas and
having a water tank are completely unrelated. The only reason for
the rule is to blatantly prop up the reticulated gas industry. For
this purpose it seems to have worked - the rule may account
for my observation at the start of this paragraph about the
prevalence of the installation of gas on new housing. Having to
spend a lot of money on a rainwater tank and the associated pumps
and pipework impacts badly on the economics of not installing gas
for new housing.
There are a number of issues with the use of natural gas:
- Natural gas is predominantly methane, one of the most
dangerous greenhouse gases, having many time the warming effect
of carbon dioxide. A percentage of the natural gas escapes into
the atmosphere unburnt. And when natural gas is burnt it
releases carbon dioxide, the main anthropogenic green house gas.
- Natural gas is no longer the
cheapest means of both space heating and water heating in a
house. The use of electrical powered heat pumps does the
job cheaper. Also the price of natural gas is going to increase
over the coming years as Australia's natural gas supplies run
down.
- In terms of green house gases in Victoria / Melbourne, where
electricity is largely generated from the use of brown coal,
there is not much difference in the green house gases produced.
However as the electricity grid converts to renewable over the
coming years, as it must, this will improve. As you should hope
to get at least 20 years life out of new household heating
equipment heat pumps are the way to go.
The use of ducted evaporative cooling systems. It seems that
this type of cooling system is installed on over 50% of new housing
in the Melbourne estates I have seen. While in terms of running cost
they are not too bad however there are a couple of issues with them:
- The use of ducting means that the ceiling vents punch holes
through the ceiling insulation so lessening the the thermal
performance of the house all year round, both summer and winter.
- The evaporative units on the roof are often poorly placed on
the northern facing section of the roof. There are two issues
with this:
- it takes away prime roof area that could be used for
photovoltaic panels; and
- the unit can shade the panels that are installed,
decreasing their generating capacity (though provided the
panels have by pass diodes this may not be as significant as
it might otherwise be).
If an evaporative unit is installed it should be on the south
facing roof, or if it can't be placed there, on the east or west
roof face, as far south as possible. (It is possible this may
not apply if you are building a single storey house to the south
of an existing double storey house which would block all
northern sun to your roof. Hopefully this is a rare exception.)
Evaporative unit placement is a no cost change so there should
be no barrier to it being done.
This also applies to the placement of other roof
penetrations such as Whirlybirds (see below), chimneys and
flues and other venting pipes, and television antennas - even a
thin line of shading risks adversely affecting photovoltaic
panel performance. Even if you don't intend to install
photovoltaic panels straight away (or even at all) taking into
account these points leaves open the possibility, preserving the
largest possible north facing roof space for panels.
- Evaporative units are not that effective on either very hot
days or very humid days.
- They consume quite a bit of water - one reference from simple
Google search suggested that a whole of house ducted unit may
use up to 25 litres per hour - but this depends on the size of
the unit and the weather conditions - one website even said it
was much higher than this. The level of water consumption may be
important in years of drought and more so these days when in
many places water supplies are supplemented by energy consuming
desalination plants.
If the house is well designed and has reverse cycle heat pump air
conditioning it may be better to just use this - and ceiling and
other fans - for all cooling requirements. This is especially
beneficial if the house has a photovoltaic system which may be
sufficient to run the air conditioning during the daytime. Last
summer (2019/20) I used my air-conditioning for about 2 hours for
the whole summer period. This was probably not a typical summer (the
longest "heat wave" was 2 days), my house is rated 7.2 stars (above
the mandatory 6 stars), I am careful in the operation of the house
on hot summer days and I was prepared to live with inside
temperatures of 27/28 degrees on a couple of occasions. It still
seems to be a complete waste of money to install a whole new cooling
system for such a small use, at least in Melbourne. (It may be more
effective in warmer climes where cooling requirements predominate.)
The use of "Whirlybird" roof space ventilators. These
ventilators do not extract enough hot air to have a significant
impact on the heat in a roof space. It is amazing that they are
still so popular. Is it because people are demanding them or because
builders are just installing them because they have done it in the
past? The other issue I have with them are that they operate all
year round so even in the middle of winter when some heat in the
roof space might be beneficial they are still allowing that heat to
escape. I understand that there are hoods that can be put on them
for winter - I have yet to see one. If you decide you require some
roof space ventilation (which is still not necessary) it would be
better to use a solar powered ventilator - one that has their own
dedicated PV panel. They exact many times the volume of air compared
to an unpowered Whirlybird and some models can often be switched off
so they don't operate over winter. If they are to be used, as per
the previous section, try to ensure that they don't disrupt the
future placement of PV panels on the north facing roof. Probably the
west face would be the best location as it would allow operations
later into the afternoon on hot days. (I also think they should have
a duct so that the air removed is from the top of the ceiling
insulation batts rather than the top of the roof space where the
temperature doesn't matter - but I have no data to back up the
comparative effectiveness of this arrangement - nor even read of
anyone else recommending this arrangement!) But all in all I think
it is better to save your money - it would be better to buy an extra
PV panel or install thicker ceiling insulation with the savings.
The use of ducted heating and cooling. As stated in the
evaporative heating system section above ducting punches holes
though the ceiling insulation. They can also leak their heated air
and lose their cool air into the roof space where it is wasted.
Instead of ducted heating / cooling systems new housing should be
using split reverse cycle air conditioning systems. These systems
usually have a unit mounted on the wall inside and an external unit.
While the inside unit is usually wall mounted you can get floor
mounted and ceiling mounted units - though these are usually more
expensive. You can also have one external unit connected to multiple
internal units. This is called a multi-head split air-conditioning
unit and it limits the number of external units is neater than
having multiple single units.
Poor placement of Photo-voltaic system inverters. I sometimes
see the inverters placed on the northern wall of the house. The
issue with this is that the inverter may well be subject to the full
force of the sun on the very days that they are working at their
hardest, e.g. sunny forty degree plus days. I have read that this is
potentially very bad for the inverter - with overheating shortening
their life. I have not experienced this myself - I have only ever
had one PV system and that has micro inverters - one per panel on
the roof. Overheating may be more of a problem for some brands of
inverters than others. As a general rule inverters should be placed
out of the sun preferable on the south side of the house or if not
possible/practical on the east side or else with some kind of very
well ventilated shading so it is not subject to direct sunlight.
Lack of summer shading on northern, western and eastern windows.
This can lead to a large heat load on the house from sun ingress
during summer. This heat often has to be removed by the use of the
air-conditioning system leading to higher energy use. Look at passive
house design information for methods of eliminating /
controlling this. Most housing designs seem to pay scant regard to
solar passive design methods.
Size. Large houses are still the rule rather than the
exception. A large house will require increased energy use for
heating and cooling compared to a smaller house, all other things
being equal.
Other Errors or Easy Improvements for Housing Design and
Construction
These are not errors that can be seen from the outside of the house
but stuff that I know is common place in new housing that could be
improved.
Zoning. The lack of internal zoning in a house means that
often the whole house has to be heated or cooled even when large
sections of the house are not being used. A particular problem is
open stair wells which acts as a chimney to draw heat from main
downstairs living rooms.
The use of "Tastic" bathroom light, infrared lamp and exhaust
fan. These (and similar brands) seem quite ubiquitous - I have
them installed in my house! These units require a large hole to be
left around the unit in the ceiling insulation. I also find that the
heating lamps are not that effective at keeping the person warm. I
think it would be better to have these functions split into
individual units - lighting from a batten fix LED globe, exhaust fan
as a separate fan unit and heating from a wall mounted radiant bar
heater or panel. It will cost more but I consider worth it.
Widespread use of down lights. Even though these are LED
these days (rather than the power guzzling halogen variety) they
still require holes in the insulation. While these holes are usually
improved by having down light covers it is still better to not use
down lights at all (or just use sparingly). I just use the old
fashioned batten fix fixture with an LED globe and a nice looking
batten fix lampshade.
Poor Window Coverings. Windows are the thermal weak point in
the housing envelop. Good quality window coverings at least
partially address this. Good quality covering are heavy
drapes with pelmets and also concertina blinds (also called
honeycomb or cellular blinds). "Verticals" and Venetian blinds are
poor insulators.
Non installation of ceiling fans in living areas. Ceiling
fans - and other portable fans - are a low cost way of cooling a
person. They will usually allow a person to feel comfortable at a
higher temperature and to therefore put off turning on the higher
energy using air conditioning. A couple of issues though - the
ceiling height needs to be at least 2550mm. While I have them
installed in my bedroom my issue is that if I use them overnight I
will often wake in the morning quite cold. For bedrooms the ceiling
fan needs to have a timer on it but the installation electrician did
not know of an appropriate timer and I have not been able to source
one since.
Some further ideas on the New
Energy Thinking website.
Errors in Operation of the Air Conditioning System
This is a bit different to the rest of this page it is about how the
house is operated and how this can be improved so that the house
uses less energy to maintain comfort.
I have been reading a few Facebook and other forums on housing. I
have been surprised about the number of people who say when they get
to winter they set the thermostat on the air conditioning to 20 or
higher and leave the temperature there 24 hours per day for the
whole house for all of winter.
Firstly 20 degrees is a good setting - it is what I use on my air
conditioning in winter, though I certainly tolerate temperatures
down to 18 degrees prior to turning the air conditioning on. However
the setting of the temperature on the air conditioning to a figure
and leaving it there for the whole of winter is incredibly wasteful.
Consider overnight when everyone is in their bedrooms. You do not
need 20 degrees in the living rooms then when no-one is in the
living rooms? It is a complete waste of energy. The air conditioning
should be turned off in the living rooms overnight as soon as
everyone goes to bed, if not earlier. I find that it does not take
much time to reheat the house in the morning once I get up. If it is
important for you to have a warm house in the morning then use the
timer function which most air conditioners have to set the system to
come on half an hour (or an hour if necessary) before the
first person gets up.
Also there is no need to have the bedrooms heated overnight to the
same level as during the day. I recommend the air conditioning be
turned off in the bedrooms once in bed. However if this is not
acceptable at least set it to a lower temperature overnight, say 15
degrees.
During the day it is not necessary to have the whole house heated,
unless everyone is home and all rooms are being used. So turn off
the bedrooms and other rooms if they are not being used during the
day. If the house is unoccupied during the day turn off the air
conditioning.
If you just want a set and forget operations then most air
conditioners have timer functions - use it. The settings can always
be over ridden by manual commands as necessary. You might find you
save a fortune in heating energy costs.
Green Oversite Home Page
|
|
|